From:	"sl" <junk AT bbs DOT darktech DOT org>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: inline functions -- unknown references
Date:	Sun, 02 Jan 2000 01:00:47 -0500 (EST)
Organization:	Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Lines:	23
Message-ID:	<fyoofqnexgrpubet.fnp21b0.pminews@nntp.generation.net>
References:	<200001010422 DOT WAA03622 AT lakdiva DOT slt DOT lk>
X-Complaints-To:	newsabuse AT supernews DOT com
X-Newsreader:	PMINews 2.00.1205 For OS/2
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, 31 Dec 1999 22:23:18 +0600, Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel wrote:

>I think what you should do is that you should move your say  
>plotpixel and other inlined fuctions to  header files.

	The problem is that in C++, this gets VERY ugly when you stick the
implementation of a member function in the middle of a class. I insist of
leaving all implementation in the .cc file.. 

>I hope this helps and is clear.  Please donot include the source as 
>#include name.cc instead copy the inline fuctions to a header file 
>and include it.

	I tried doing #include "name.cc", and that failed.. Shouldn't this
work in theory?

>Best Wishes to everyone for the new milennium.

	Yup, happy new year! :)

Gili

- Raw text -