From:	"David C. Hoos, Sr." <david DOT c DOT hoos DOT sr AT ada95 DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References:	<3868DC8F DOT A0B00483 AT turku DOT crosswinds DOT net> <Gn8a4.7591$78 DOT 34016 AT afrodite DOT telenet-ops DOT be> <386998e5 AT news1 DOT jps DOT net> <84ge82$29fi$2 AT news DOT gate DOT net>
Subject:	Re: What the hell is ADA?
Lines:	46
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Message-ID:	<ZnRa4.4154$9e3.210876@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	158.252.123.221
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT earthlink DOT net
X-Trace:	newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net 946594425 158.252.123.221 (Thu, 30 Dec 1999 14:53:45 PST)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Thu, 30 Dec 1999 14:53:45 PST
Organization:	EarthLink Network, Inc.
X-ELN-Date:	Thu Dec 30 14:53:45 1999
X-ELN-Insert-Date:	Thu Dec 30 14:53:45 1999
X-Posted-Path-Was:	not-for-mail
Date:	Thu, 30 Dec 1999 22:53:45 GMT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

SCOTT19U.ZIP_GUY <dscott AT networkusa DOT net> wrote in message
news:84ge82$29fi$2 AT news DOT gate DOT net...
> In article <386998e5 AT news1 DOT jps DOT net>, "Mike Silva" <mjsilva AT jps DOT net> wrote:
> >Ada was actually designed to meet a Department of Defense requirement for
a
> >language to develop very large and reliable embedded programs.  The
current
> >version, Ada95, is an excellent general-purpose language that can be
> >compared in scope to C++, while making it much easier to write correct,
> >error-free code -- hence its frequent use in aircraft systems, traffic
> >control, medical equipment, etc.  It's also got built-in concurrency.
>
>    Ada is a nightmare. While it may look good on paper it sucks
> for embedded programs. True it was designed by committe for the
> military but it does not comprare with C.
>  Many military programs because ot the nature of a high reliabilty
> being required do not use ADA. The intent at one time years ago
> was to go to ADA with new projects but it has not worked as
> advertised and is waste of money.
> Lets hope it dies a quick death.
> Also the newer ada compliers are really based on C++ compliers
> and there is really nothing ADA can do that C or C++ can not do
> better.
>

Just curious -- but on what data do you base these assertions?

Can you name one military program that does not use Ada because
"of a high reliability being required?"

Can you name one Ada compiler that is based on a C++ compiler?

--
David C. Hoos -- W1DCH
--------------------------------------
Are you ready for Y2K?
A plan without a disaster is better
than a disaster without a plan.
------------------------------------------
"The prudent man sees danger and takes refuge.
The simple keep going and suffer for it"
              (Proverbs 22:3)

- Raw text -