delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Weiqi Gao <weiqigao AT a DOT crl DOT com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: djgpp strangeness |
Date: | Thu, 23 Dec 1999 13:36:54 -0600 |
Organization: | CRL Network Services |
Lines: | 12 |
Message-ID: | <386279D6.61CBA599@a.crl.com> |
References: | <tmU74.34$Fc6 DOT 1542 AT weber DOT videotron DOT net> <14684.897$Qz2 DOT 16629 AT wagner DOT videotron DOT net> <Yue84.371$36 DOT 7194 AT carnaval DOT risq DOT qc DOT ca> <38618321 DOT 667C7F69 AT a DOT crl DOT com> <iis84.536$36 DOT 12170 AT carnaval DOT risq DOT qc DOT ca> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | a116022.stl1.as.crl.com |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5-15 i586) |
X-Accept-Language: | en |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Alain Magloire wrote: > > No, that is not my point, the point is malloc()/free() will not > call the constructor or destructor of a class, reread the post. I understand you perfectly: calling malloc()/free() will not call constructors and destructors. What I'm saying is that that may not be enough to explain the bug. -- Weiqi Gao weiqigao AT a DOT crl DOT com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |