From:	khan AT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu (Mumit Khan)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: <limits>
Date:	11 Dec 1999 23:48:24 GMT
Organization:	Center for X-ray Lithography, UW-Madison
Lines:	26
Message-ID:	<82uns8$him$1@news.doit.wisc.edu>
References:	<82telu$l7b$1 AT bgtnsc03 DOT worldnet DOT att DOT net> <38527471 DOT 7E3E68D3 AT math DOT gatech DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	modi.xraylith.wisc.edu
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In article <38527471 DOT 7E3E68D3 AT math DOT gatech DOT edu>,
Luis Hernandez  <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>"Gregg T. Geiger" wrote:
>
>> Some time ago, the subject of the missing <limits> header was the subject of
>> discussion in this group - lately not, though.  As of version 2.95.2 the
>> header is still missing.  Is there ongoing activity to correct this
>> omission?  BTW, many thanks for a really nice compiler.
>
>   You can build that file by  yourself
>(well not exactly by yourself).  Please
>follow the link below:
>
>http://www.cwi.nl/~steven/enquire.html


Gregg Geiger is asking about <limits> mandated by ISO C++ standard, 
which is quite different from C limits.h file created by enquire.
The current libstdc++ (C++ runtime library) that comes  with gcc 
releases falls quite short of the standard, and we're all waiting 
for the new libstdc++-v3 project to finish, which will provide a 
ISO compliant C++ library (http://sourceware.cygnus.com/libstdc++/).

Regards,
Mumit

- Raw text -