Mail Archives: djgpp/1999/12/01/23:28:12
Hi,
People in this newsgroup, would
prefer that you use your time, to
introduce new drivers, and graphical
support internally to DesqView; for
modern hardware, for DesqView,
apparently emphasizing graphics
boards .
Remember too, that the likliest
permanent niche for DesqView, is
the smallest, oldest machines, and
size is crucial .
Ken .
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999 15:08:11 GMT,
Stargazer <black_phantom AT my-deja DOT com>
wrote:
> Gautier DOT deMontmollin AT maths DOT unine DOT ch
wrote:
>> What new functionalities compared to,
say, DR-DOS
>> multitasking kernel, that took years
to be debugged ?...
>
> I don't think there's something
principally new to be done about
>DOS, at least as I see it. My system
currently runs on top of DOS and
>is not bound to any specific vendor or
version. It takes like 200 K of
>memory and doesn't impose further
system requirements.
>
> The most significant difference
probably is that I'm still flexible.
>I'm not sure by now that I want to
develop a whole DOS package. I can
>customize a multitasking solution to a
legacy DOS-based system or
>custom DOS-based embedded system rather
than pull you to use something
>given and unchangeable.
>
>
>-- http://bphantom.tripod.com --
>
>-- God knows as your dog knows
>Bog blast all of you ---
>
>
>Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>Before you buy.
- Raw text -