Date:	Sun, 31 Oct 1999 10:01:12 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	"sephiroth AT id-base DOT com" <sephiroth AT id-base DOT com>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: #pragma.
In-Reply-To:	<3819E49F.E4B87894@id-base.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.991031100047.2988Z-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, 29 Oct 1999, sephiroth AT id-base DOT com wrote:

> Unfortuantly I have not been
> able to find information specific to DJGPP's #pragma directives. If
> someone could tell me where they are, I would appreciated, thank you.

The GCC maintainers thing #pragma is a bad idea, and generally don't
use it.  It is most probably that whatever you want to do with pragmas
can be achieved in GCC with some other means.  But you need to tell us
what is it that you want to do, in order for us to help you find the
way of doing it.

- Raw text -