From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Read Me Third: A Short FAQ List
Date:	Thu, 28 Oct 1999 19:26:38 +0200
Organization:	NetVision Israel
Lines:	10
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.991028192615.9453K-100000@is>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 991020140410 DOT 22660f-100000 AT is> <0A02668AA6DAF2EA DOT B7324B0997533B2E DOT A43653802EA26ABD AT lp DOT airnews DOT net> <7oUXONJSazygooCyeWwSD8msc766 AT 4ax DOT com> <38193387 DOT 616294 AT news DOT bigpond DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	is.elta.co.il
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	news.netvision.net.il 941131517 7999 199.203.121.2 (28 Oct 1999 17:25:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT netvision DOT net DOT il
NNTP-Posting-Date:	28 Oct 1999 17:25:17 GMT
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
In-Reply-To:	<38193387.616294@news.bigpond.com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Chris Mears wrote:

> I haven't read the C++ standard in a while, but I have a funny feeling
> there was a provision for main() not to have a return statement.  If
> it was omitted, it implicitly returned 0.  Can anyone confirm/shoot me
> down?

You are right, the C++ Standard does say that.  And GCC indeed behaves
like this.

- Raw text -