From:	"Damian Yerrick" <web DOT poison AT pineight DOT 8m DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: mktime implememtation problem
Date:	Wed, 13 Oct 1999 16:18:08 -0500
Organization:	Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Lines:	23
Message-ID:	<7u2t20$nfq$1@solomon.cs.rose-hulman.edu>
References:	<3803A628 DOT 92B59B8B AT earthlink DOT net> <7u1ju9$fe2$2 AT antares DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	137.112.205.146
X-Trace:	solomon.cs.rose-hulman.edu 939849600 24058 137.112.205.146 (13 Oct 1999 21:20:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	news AT cs DOT rose-hulman DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Date:	13 Oct 1999 21:20:00 GMT
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Martin Stromberg <eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> wrote in message
news:7u1ju9$fe2$2 AT antares DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se...
> Martin Ambuhl (mambuhl AT earthlink DOT net) wrote:
> : The standard requires of mktime that "the original values of tm_wday and
> : rm_yday components of the structure are ignored."  I have discovered
> : that if I do not set these components to possibly legal values, mktime
> : returns (time_t)-1, meaning that it fails.  Will this be corrected, or
> : do I just live with it?
>
> Which standard?

ANSI C, or ISO C, or whatever it's called now.

> Right,

At least I think so.


Damian Yerrick
http://come.to/yerrick

- Raw text -