delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: allegro gone missing? |
Date: | Wed, 13 Oct 1999 11:42:28 +0200 |
Organization: | NetVision Israel |
Lines: | 12 |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.991013114157.16702F-100000@is> |
References: | <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 991011122627 DOT 28307G-100000 AT is> <380282EA DOT 3E6A AT earthlink DOT net> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | is.elta.co.il |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Trace: | news.netvision.net.il 939807671 15231 199.203.121.2 (13 Oct 1999 09:41:11 GMT) |
X-Complaints-To: | abuse AT netvision DOT net DOT il |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | 13 Oct 1999 09:41:11 GMT |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
In-Reply-To: | <380282EA.3E6A@earthlink.net> |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Mon, 11 Oct 1999, Rez wrote: > I don't know about Windows' DPMI, but I did some performance testing of > CSWDPMI vs DRDOS7.03's DPMI. BOOM (DOOM clone) ran at the same speed +/- > less than 0.1% difference (however it takes quite a bit longer to get > thrashy on DRDOS's DPMI). OTOH, BSPv3.0 ran at 10% faster on DRDOS's > DPMI. This was reproducible and consistent. Don't forget that CWSDPMI was written by a single engineer on his spare time. Given that, I think 10% of a performance hit, and then in some specific cases only, is acceptable.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |