delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | "Damian Yerrick" <web DOT poison AT pineight DOT 8m DOT com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: allegro gone missing? |
Date: | Tue, 12 Oct 1999 12:10:51 -0500 |
Organization: | Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology |
Lines: | 26 |
Message-ID: | <7tvq6d$ccs$1@solomon.cs.rose-hulman.edu> |
References: | <19991012053219 DOT 9064 DOT rocketmail AT web1402 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <lAFM3.3249$_4 DOT 5461 AT newsfeeds DOT bigpond DOT com> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | yerricde.laptop.rose-hulman.edu |
X-Trace: | solomon.cs.rose-hulman.edu 939748365 12700 137.112.111.210 (12 Oct 1999 17:12:45 GMT) |
X-Complaints-To: | news AT cs DOT rose-hulman DOT edu |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | 12 Oct 1999 17:12:45 GMT |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Newsreader: | Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Johan Venter <jventer AT writeme DOT com> wrote: > Prashant TR <prashant_news AT yahoo DOT com> wrote: > > > > The speed is due to file cacheing and other features > > of Windows 95. I don't know if you could ever measure > > the speed of a DPMI host. How did you do it, anyway ? > > For some reason I find that compiling in DOS under CWSDPMI > is takes about twice as long as compiling in Windows under its > DPMI server. When compiling under CWSDPMI, the compilation > does more disk thrashing than usual (noticeably more). Before you run RHIDE or make, try typing at C:\> smartdrv c+ Compiling in gcc uses a lot of different EXE files, and Windows by default caches them in memory. Damian Yerrick http://come.to/yerrick DY uses Outlook JV uses Outlook How did I know this?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |