From:	Nate Eldredge <neldredge AT hmc DOT edu>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: What is a good DJGPP editor?
Date:	Sun, 10 Oct 1999 13:25:48 -0700
Organization:	Harvey Mudd College
Lines:	17
Message-ID:	<3800F64C.70547F8C@hmc.edu>
References:	<7tjk6o$10v$1 AT pumpkin DOT pangea DOT ca> <7tjmt3$9j5 AT dfw-ixnews3 DOT ix DOT netcom DOT com> <37FD98A1 DOT 449000C6 AT snetch DOT cpg DOT com DOT au> <380035ed DOT 6410122 AT news DOT pasteur DOT dialix DOT com DOT au> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 991010123140 DOT 19618X-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	mercury.st.hmc.edu
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	nntp1.interworld.net 939587192 43348 134.173.45.219 (10 Oct 1999 20:26:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT nntp1 DOT interworld DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Date:	10 Oct 1999 20:26:32 GMT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.13pre12 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	en
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 10 Oct 1999, Kieran Farrell wrote:
> 
> > Hmm, borland makes much smaller and faster exe's.
> 
> Smaller: sometimes (especially for small toy proigrams).  Faster: no
> way!

It might be faster in severely I/O-bound programs.  i.e. `cat' could be
a bit faster in Borland C than in DJGPP, because the mode switch
involves some overhead.  If you do any crunching, though, you should see
a speedup with DJGPP.
-- 

Nate Eldredge
neldredge AT hmc DOT edu

- Raw text -