From:	Felix Natter <f DOT natter AT ndh DOT net>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: problems gcc2.95.1 with binutils 2.81 ?
Date:	10 Oct 1999 13:41:58 +0200
Organization:	Customer of NDH Netzwerkdienste Hoeger GmbH
Message-ID:	<wkemf3v3w9.fsf@mail.ndh.net>
References:	<wkhfk0lvtv DOT fsf AT mail DOT ndh DOT net> <Ik_L3.1824$_4 DOT 2912 AT newsfeeds DOT bigpond DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	port239.bonn.ndh.net
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	passat.ndh.net 939562917 13404 195.94.93.239 (10 Oct 1999 13:41:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT ndh DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Date:	10 Oct 1999 13:41:57 GMT
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.070084 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.84) Emacs/20.4
Lines:	15
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

"Johan Venter" <jventer AT writeme DOT com> writes:
> I use gcc 2.95 (not 2.95.1) with binutils 2.8.1 and I've had absolutely no
> problems so far. What problems are you having?

no, I am not having any problems either, I was just asking
if one should better use the 2.9.1 binutils, because
in the gcc-2.95(.1) readme it tells you that 2.9.1 is
recommended.
I just got mail from Eli Zaretski though, and he said
there are no known issues with 2.8.1, ít would simply
be nice to do some beta-testing onm 2.9.1 (if you want to).

--
Felix Natter

- Raw text -