From:	alainm AT news DOT RISQ DOT QC DOT CA (Alain Magloire)
Subject:	Re: Why not DJGPP?
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References:	<7tj71d$e9h$1 AT nnrp1 DOT deja DOT com> <37FD2CC7 DOT F899F64F AT a DOT crl DOT com>
X-Newsreader:	TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Lines:	19
Message-ID:	<0opL3.22744$j6.207955@carnaval.risq.qc.ca>
Date:	Fri, 08 Oct 1999 16:57:32 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	132.206.63.174
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT mcgill DOT ca
X-Trace:	carnaval.risq.qc.ca 939401852 132.206.63.174 (Fri, 08 Oct 1999 12:57:32 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Fri, 08 Oct 1999 12:57:32 EDT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Weiqi Gao (weiqigao AT a DOT crl DOT com) wrote:
: Nicolas Blais wrote:
: > 
: > DJGPP is AWESOME, but why is it that my school pays for WATCOMM C++,
: > is it better?

: They probably don't know.  Tell them and save.

There is simple argument to convice them, Watcomm is dead as a product.
10.6/11.0 is the final and 11.0 will never see the light of day on some
platforms.
If they want a C++ Compiler that will follow the new ISO/C std, it's
time to move on.


--
au revoir, alain
----
Aussi haut que l'on soit assis, on est toujours assis que sur son cul !!!

- Raw text -