From:	"Damian Yerrick" <web DOT poison AT pineight DOT 8m DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: off topic: what is foo?
Date:	Fri, 1 Oct 1999 13:15:32 -0500
Organization:	Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Lines:	19
Message-ID:	<7t2trt$a9$1@solomon.cs.rose-hulman.edu>
References:	<7t2er4$uoq$1 AT nnrp1 DOT deja DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	yerricde.laptop.rose-hulman.edu
X-Trace:	solomon.cs.rose-hulman.edu 938801853 329 137.112.103.81 (1 Oct 1999 18:17:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	news AT cs DOT rose-hulman DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Date:	1 Oct 1999 18:17:33 GMT
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

<chongkong AT my-deja DOT com> wrote in message news:7t2er4$uoq$1 AT nnrp1 DOT deja DOT com...
> can anyone explain to me just why is so many sample code uses foo as a
> variable or function name?

1. It has nothing to do with the rock band Foo Fighters.
http://www.foofighters.com/
2. foo, bar, etc. are common metasyntactic variables used in
programming examples.
3. foo and bar are commonly thought to derive from the military
acronym FUBAR (fouled up beyond all recognition/repair).
4. For more information, look at the Jargon File.
http://www.ude.org/jargon/jargon.html#metasyntactic%20variable


Damian Yerrick
http://come.to/yerrick

- Raw text -