From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Interrupts reserved for BASIC
Date:	Wed, 29 Sep 1999 10:31:55 +0200
Organization:	NetVision Israel
Lines:	10
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990929103134.11087Q-100000@is>
References:	<7slrv7$4nv$1 AT solomon DOT cs DOT rose-hulman DOT edu> <7sn3ai$ffq AT globalserve DOT net> <7sqtfp$5dt AT globalserve DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	is.elta.co.il
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	news.netvision.net.il 938593844 2162 199.203.121.2 (29 Sep 1999 08:30:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT netvision DOT net DOT il
NNTP-Posting-Date:	29 Sep 1999 08:30:44 GMT
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
In-Reply-To:	<7sqtfp$5dt@globalserve.net>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 28 Sep 1999, George Swan wrote:

> After reading some of the other responses here I thought I would
> add that I have always assumed that, since DOS isn't multi-tasking,
> that any interrupt vector that contained a NULL pointer was available
> for my program to use.

AFAIK, unused interrupts don't have a NULL pointer in the interrupt
vector table, they have a pointer to an IRET instruction.

- Raw text -