delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: Compiling GCC |
Date: | Sun, 26 Sep 1999 07:57:03 +0200 |
Organization: | NetVision Israel |
Lines: | 11 |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.990926075514.17688C-100000@is> |
References: | <B0000102732 AT stargate DOT astr DOT lu DOT lv> <B0000102979 AT stargate DOT astr DOT lu DOT lv> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | is.elta.co.il |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Trace: | news.netvision.net.il 938325348 20430 199.203.121.2 (26 Sep 1999 05:55:48 GMT) |
X-Complaints-To: | abuse AT netvision DOT net DOT il |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | 26 Sep 1999 05:55:48 GMT |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
In-Reply-To: | <B0000102979@stargate.astr.lu.lv> |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Fri, 24 Sep 1999 pavenis AT lanet DOT lv wrote: > I would agree that //x/foo is not nice idea, but I also think that > dependence of results on directory name (results are different for > c:/tmp/x/ and c:/tmp/xxxxxxxx/ shows that we perhaps have a bug What I wanted to point out was that it might be not a bug in the usual sense, but rather some side-effect of the special hacks that Bash 1.14.7 does to avoid interpreting Sed scripts as file names in the //x/foo format. I agree that from the user's point of view it is still a bug.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |