From:	"Damian Yerrick" <web DOT poison AT pineight DOT 8m DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: EXE format
Date:	Fri, 24 Sep 1999 16:14:21 -0500
Organization:	Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Lines:	22
Message-ID:	<7sgpn1$hkk$1@solomon.cs.rose-hulman.edu>
References:	<37E6A0B0 DOT 9246A756 AT tudor21 DOT net> <963 DOT 990923 AT Phreaker DOT net> <19990924141005 DOT E1496 AT crater DOT eth DOT ericsson DOT se>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	137.112.205.146
X-Trace:	solomon.cs.rose-hulman.edu 938207777 18068 137.112.205.146 (24 Sep 1999 21:16:17 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	news AT cs DOT rose-hulman DOT edu
NNTP-Posting-Date:	24 Sep 1999 21:16:17 GMT
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

PE is the Win32 executable format, and NE is Windows 3.x's.

> On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 01:31:45AM +0700, Batchex wrote:
> > Thanks for the info. I've searched wotsit.org and only finds win31 exe
> > format (NE-EXE). What I need is win9x exe format (PE-EXE, or is PE &
> > NE exe is the same???). I've looked into the win95 exe(s) with a
> > HexEditor, and find PE instead of NE (like the one described in
> > wotsit.org docs).

Laszlo Molnar <laszlo DOT molnar AT eth DOT ericsson DOT se> wrote in message
news:19990924141005 DOT E1496 AT crater DOT eth DOT ericsson DOT se...
>
> No, PE and NE are not the same format. Check out the source code of
> Wine, you can find lots of useful info in it about both formats.
>
> http://www.winehq.com/
>
> HTH,Laszlo

Did/will UPX ever support NE?

- Raw text -