From:	eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se (Martin Stromberg)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Why malloc() and free() take so much time ?
Date:	16 Sep 1999 11:28:19 GMT
Organization:	Ericsson Erisoft AB, Sweden
Message-ID:	<7rqk8j$n1d$1@antares.lu.erisoft.se>
References:	<37E0B563 DOT 67698DE8 AT accord-soft DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	propus-144.lu.erisoft.se
X-Newsreader:	TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Lines:	29
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Sunil V. (sunilv AT accord-soft DOT com) wrote:
: This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
: --------------6BA90FC783E18B9E6832DC28
: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

: Hello Everybody,

:      A piece of my code looks as follows:


:     AllocateHugeBlock()
:       -----
:       -----
:       -----
:     FreeHugeBlock()

: "AllocateHugeBlock" allocates 500 blocks each of size 62000 bytes. And
: "FreeHugeBlock" frees the same. These two functions are taking most of
: my execution time. What I want to know is, whether there is any
: workaround for doing the same in a much less time?

Perhaps allocate one block of size 500*62000, and then setting up the 
pointers to point at the right place in the single block?


Right,

							MartinS

- Raw text -