Message-Id:	<3.0.6.16.19990914092823.2a8fd70e@mail.cybercable.fr>
Organization:	Michelle's Internet Service
X-Link:	http://www.michelle-is.com/index.htm
X-Moto:	Micr0$oft = What do you want to crash today?
X-Sender:	starone AT mail DOT cybercable DOT fr
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (16)
Date:	Tue, 14 Sep 1999 09:28:23 +0100
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
From:	Michelle Konzack <starone AT cybercable DOT fr>
Subject:	Re: An updated DOS - Please discuss
In-Reply-To:	<FiU33$OzC@c400>
References:	<37d7913a DOT 10901976 AT news-reader DOT bt DOT net>
	<37d8570d$0$14670 AT mojo DOT crosslink DOT net>
	<37d9bd34 DOT 955844 AT news-reader DOT bt DOT net>
	<7rfieg$70a$1 AT Mars DOT mcs DOT net>
	<37DC0C7A DOT 56537E8C AT btinternet DOT com>
	<37dcadd6 DOT 336383 AT news-reader DOT bt DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

At 18:55 13.09.1999 GMT, you wrote
--------> This was the original Message:
MK>michael AT toobie DOT demon DOT co DOT uk (Michael Kearns) wrote:
MK>> 
MK>> My knowledge of Linux isn't as good as it should be, but whenever I have
MK>> used it, it has the following 'aspects' which I don't see as very
DOS-like.
MK>> Boot time - This is generally quite long, even compared to windows.

Are you sure ???

I am using a 486DX4-100 and 64 MB of Ram with Debian 2.1 and it boots cold 
in less the 30 Seconds to KDE 1.1.1.

WinSuck 95 need around 23 second on my AMD K5-133 wit 128 MB of Ram

MK>Well, not compared to windows NT.

And WinSuck NT 4.0 neds 58 second on my Double PPro 200 with 2x 512 MByte.
Somtimes it makse scandisk too, but I do not know why... 
...and it needs around 8 Minutes

Webmistress Michelle

- Raw text -