From:	les AT Mars DOT mcs DOT net (Leslie Mikesell)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject:	Re: An updated DOS - Please discuss
Date:	14 Sep 1999 02:02:09 -0500
Organization:	Unknown
Lines:	16
Message-ID:	<7rkrth$1lie$1@Mars.mcs.net>
References:	<37d7913a DOT 10901976 AT news-reader DOT bt DOT net> <37d9bd34 DOT 955844 AT news-reader DOT bt DOT net> <7rfieg$70a$1 AT Mars DOT mcs DOT net> <37DC0C7A DOT 56537E8C AT btinternet DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	mars.mcs.net
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In article <37DC0C7A DOT 56537E8C AT btinternet DOT com>,
Thomas Harte  <T DOT Harte AT btinternet DOT com> wrote:

>	To me it seems the goal is to create an efficient operating system with the
>feel of DOS rather than a multi-programming DOS compatible. But, in that case,
>would it not be quite a bit easier and still achieve the same targets if a DOS
>shell for UNIX was created? Not only would you be able to port it around quite
>easily in terms of target hardware, but you would appease UNIX distributors
>who are looking for a way to make things such as Linux look easier to the
>DOS/windows user and so probably gain a lot of support.

There was something like that done for Xenix about 15 years ago.  As far
as I could tell everyone who actually tried it hated it.

  Les Mikesell
   les AT mcs DOT com

- Raw text -