From:	Nate Eldredge <neldredge AT hmc DOT edu>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Assembly in DJGPP (MMX etc)
Date:	Sun, 05 Sep 1999 12:40:21 -0700
Organization:	Harvey Mudd College
Lines:	27
Message-ID:	<37D2C725.77BB05D8@hmc.edu>
References:	<7qtv03$ck$1 AT lure DOT pipex DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	mercury.st.hmc.edu
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	nntp1.interworld.net 936560430 77184 134.173.45.219 (5 Sep 1999 19:40:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT nntp1 DOT interworld DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Date:	5 Sep 1999 19:40:30 GMT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.08 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12pre4 i586)
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Duncan Coutts wrote:
> 
> I know the standard gcc inline assembler uses the AT&T syntax rather than
> the more common intel notation. I suspect (but an no sure) that the inline
> assembler is not very recent and does not support new instructions eg MMX,
> P6 or 3DNOW (I noticed that it doesn't even support segment override
> prefixes! - see farptr.h).
> My question therefore is what is the best way to include assembly (including
> new instruction sets - MMX in particular) into my programs. Also, I don't
> suppose there is any chance of inlining instead of linking?
> My aim is to optimise the rendering and geometric transformation routines in
> my 3D engine using MMX instructions.
> 
> Thanks in advance for any suggestions.

Actually, I think Binutils 2.9.1 does support MMX, and more recent
snapshots support 3dnow and and the other Instructions Of The Week. 
(Note that IIRC 2.9.1 has a bug where it generates the wrong opcode for
`pand'.)

GNU as *has* supported segment overrides since time out of mind, but in
some versions they were buggy.  farptr.h uses the .byte method in case
it encounters one of these versions.
-- 

Nate Eldredge
neldredge AT hmc DOT edu

- Raw text -