Message-ID:	<37CF01AE.1BACA838@unb.ca>
From:	Endlisnis <s257m AT unb DOT ca>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Assembly tutorial
References:	<7pmoef$mjm$1 AT wanadoo DOT fr> <37CDAFCA DOT 944E93A7 AT swipnet DOT se>
	<37CDC58A DOT A8B0CEBA AT hmc DOT edu> <V1OHICAW0iz3Ewd5 AT xemu DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Lines:	21
Date:	Fri, 03 Sep 1999 14:00:31 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	198.164.188.57
X-Trace:	news21.bellglobal.com 936367231 198.164.188.57 (Fri, 03 Sep 1999 10:00:31 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Fri, 03 Sep 1999 10:00:31 EDT
Organization:	Sympatico
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Dave Bird wrote:

> In article <37CDC58A DOT A8B0CEBA AT hmc DOT edu>, Nate Eldredge
> <neldredge AT hmc DOT edu> writes
> >> You should really consider using NASM instead, unless
> >> you want your code to look cryptic :)
> >
> >Didn't C look cryptic before you learned it?
> No, PL/M looked cryptic which is why I learned C instead.

    Nothing looks cryptic compared to APL.


--
     (\/) Endlisnis (\/)
          s257m AT unb DOT ca
          Endlisnis AT HotMail DOT com
          ICQ: 32959047

- Raw text -