From:	Dave Bird <dave AT xemu DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Assembly tutorial
Date:	Thu, 2 Sep 1999 08:53:58 +0100
Organization:	ARS HakeMongers inc...... ><_'> <_"
Message-ID:	<V1OHICAW0iz3Ewd5@xemu.demon.co.uk>
References:	<7pmoef$mjm$1 AT wanadoo DOT fr> <37CDAFCA DOT 944E93A7 AT swipnet DOT se>
	<37CDC58A DOT A8B0CEBA AT hmc DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	xemu.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host:	xemu.demon.co.uk:158.152.196.209
X-Trace:	news.demon.co.uk 936302649 nnrp-09:27387 NO-IDENT xemu.demon.co.uk:158.152.196.209
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT demon DOT net
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Newsreader:	Turnpike (32) Version 4.01 <dQumtnY$x4rJ2u5tL5fS$n2vuP>
Lines:	13
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In article <37CDC58A DOT A8B0CEBA AT hmc DOT edu>, Nate Eldredge
<neldredge AT hmc DOT edu> writes
>> You should really consider using NASM instead, unless
>> you want your code to look cryptic :)
>
>Didn't C look cryptic before you learned it?

No, PL/M looked cryptic which is why I learned C instead.


-- 
   ^-^-^-@@-^-;-^   http://www.xemu.demon.co.uk/
        (..)__u     news:alt.smoking.mooses

- Raw text -