Message-ID:	<37C98EFC.F0167A74@unb.ca>
From:	Endlisnis <s257m AT unb DOT ca>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: DJGPP (gcc) and Borland IDE
References:	<37C047CA DOT DAE5F79C AT bigfoot DOT com> <37C15F25 DOT 2003401A AT inti DOT gov DOT ar> <37C5A692 DOT B41EE156 AT bigfoot DOT com> <37C687DA DOT 94623C43 AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Lines:	23
Date:	Sun, 29 Aug 1999 23:54:46 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	198.164.188.196
X-Trace:	news20.bellglobal.com 935970886 198.164.188.196 (Sun, 29 Aug 1999 19:54:46 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Sun, 29 Aug 1999 19:54:46 EDT
Organization:	Sympatico
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

salvador wrote:

> > I've read somewhere that borland turbo debugger compatible debug symbols where part
> > of NASM or at least someone added that support in a plugin or whatever (I don't use
> > NASM, just read that while searching) If somebody did it for nasm...
> There are a project to use nasm as replacement for "as" (the assembler used by gcc),
> look for it, if nasm really supports it.
> But I think Borland's debugger will have a lot of troubles to debug a dpmi
> application.

    I know that TurboDebug that came with BC3.1 cannot run DJGPP programs correctly.  I
tried it once and got a message like "no DPMI".  And it mentioned getting the zip file for
the DOS dpmi server, but I was running under Win95, so it may somehow confuse or block the
dpmi calls.

--
     (\/) Endlisnis (\/)
          s257m AT unb DOT ca
          Endlisnis AT HotMail DOT com
          ICQ: 32959047

- Raw text -