Date:	Wed, 18 Aug 1999 16:53:06 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Ben Parnell <zaik AT kc DOT net>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Timer interrupt
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.3.96.990817215814.5987A-100000@tortugas.idir.net>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990818165152.10490d-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Ben Parnell wrote:

> Actually, I don't think it would cause too much of a problem with DOS,
> since I have some code that will increase the tick counter at 
> 0x46c approximately 18.2 times second, even though the timer is programmed
> to generate an interrupt other than 18.2 times a second.

I'm not sure incrementing the timer counter is all there is to it.  I 
think chaining to the previous handler is a prudent thing to do, and it 
also shouldn't do any trouble.

- Raw text -