From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: RHide 1.4 - is there better?
Date:	Thu, 12 Aug 1999 15:54:06 +0300
Organization:	NetVision Israel
Lines:	13
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990812155058.28224D-100000@is>
References:	<19990812011506 DOT 14503 DOT 00000339 AT ng-fc1 DOT aol DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	is.elta.co.il
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	news.netvision.net.il 934462385 616 199.203.121.2 (12 Aug 1999 12:53:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT netvision DOT net DOT il
NNTP-Posting-Date:	12 Aug 1999 12:53:05 GMT
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
In-Reply-To:	<19990812011506.14503.00000339@ng-fc1.aol.com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 12 Aug 1999, Legolas10 wrote:

> Hello, I am using DJGPP for C++.  Also using RHide 1.4 as my editor.  Is there
> currently a debugger more suited for c++ than RHide?  If I am in a member
> function, I can't access class variables unless I do this->VARNAME

RHIDE is not in fault here, the problem is with the debug info format 
emitted by the compiler: it simply cannot store all the information 
necessary to debug C++ classes.  You need to use stabs debugging; compile 
your programs with the -gstabs+ switch.

This is explained in the DJGPP FAQ, btw, see section 12.7 there.

- Raw text -