From:	"Keith McCormick" <kdm98 AT spiritone DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Need help w/ building newest EGCS snapshot!!!
Date:	31 Jul 1999 10:24:21 GMT
Organization:	<none>
Lines:	37
Message-ID:	<933416661.201411@ridge.spiritone.com>
References:	<933412357 DOT 619909 AT ridge DOT spiritone DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ridge.spiritone.com
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
X-Trace-ISP:	933416660 31802 208.130.243.212 hf5o/F36:xqz98
X-Complaints-To-ISP:	abuse at spiritone dot com
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Update:

    The build I am getting the error in was one that I had patched to PGCC
and then patched to gcc295 for DJGPP.   Just to see what would happen, I
changed the build script to use the main gcc and not the one that was just
built and I did not get that error.  I am now rebuilding the gcc295 w/o the
PGCC patches applied to see if the assembly error happens.  I may be that
the PGCC patches break something being that the diff files are for an older
snapshot.

KeithM



Keith McCormick <kdm98 AT spiritone DOT com> wrote in message
news:933412357 DOT 619909 AT ridge DOT spiritone DOT com...
> I am trying to build the lastest snapshot (that is availible - version
> 19990718) of EGCS and it only gets as far as a little ways to stage2.  I
> stops with an assembler error as it is compiling 'expmed.c'.  I have
> attached the log file and the assembly source that is causing the trouble.
>
> Another thing I might mention is that I have gotten a number of warnings
> while building EGCS, such as 'const' discarded from pointer type, and
> incorrect initialization for pointer type.  Things still work up until the
> stage 2 error so are the warnings just the result of sloppy coding
> (something like that) and do not really affect the compiled item?
>
> One more question: Is the number that appears in an error or warning
> statement a line number?
>
> KeithM
>
>
>
>

- Raw text -