From:	"Simon De Deyne" <sdedeyne AT online DOT be>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	how about "more" random ?
Date:	Thu, 29 Jul 1999 10:08:35 +0200
Organization:	Customer of Online Internet
Lines:	13
Message-ID:	<7np18t$nj5$1@trex.antw.online.be>
References:	<7nn5h5$1v1$1 AT trex DOT antw DOT online DOT be> <7nn6iq$hl9$1 AT taliesin DOT netcom DOT net DOT uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	a04-225.antw.online.be
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Thanks for the answer! I did consider this way, but then,
i also noticed that the seeding with the time function  (srand) isn't
as random as when i used the other random function.
Would there be a way to get more random numbers anyway?

 Simon

> So to produce a random number between 0 and 99
> x = rand() % 100;
>

- Raw text -