From:	XXguille AT XXiies DOT XXes (Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Floating point..... I think....
Date:	Mon, 14 Jun 1999 21:24:56 GMT
Organization:	Telefonica Transmision de Datos
Lines:	19
Message-ID:	<37662f1d.915507@noticias.iies.es>
References:	<01beb63f$a8e494a0$fc4484ce AT sub>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	iies248.iies.es
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

El día 14 Jun 1999 08:28:18 GMT, "0/0" <nsousbpoanmer AT naooslp DOT com>
escribió:

>looked more accurate, when I compiled for DJGPP the DFT came out blurry,
>and the FFT came out even weirder and definetly not accurate...but I am

What are you calling DFT and FFT? DFT is a transformation, and FFT is
an algorithm to implement DFT, so how is it that you seem to have
separate functions for DFT and FFT?

I have used FFT and IFFT myself for an audio spectrum analyzer and
they worked as expected. I checked the results against Matlab. And
AFAIK, I tried both float and double with no noticeable difference.

Regards,
GUILLE
----
Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
XXguille AT XXiies DOT XXes (ya sabes :-)

- Raw text -