From:	werewolf AT stad DOT dsl DOT nl (Shadow Seeker)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: uclock trouble
Date:	Sat, 29 May 1999 09:00:14 GMT
Organization:	Shimmer Zone
Lines:	14
Message-ID:	<373eecd2.19697433@news.tudelft.nl>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990516135445 DOT 26252Y-100000 AT is> <373EBC8B DOT A6271397 AT enter DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	willow.akira.tudelft.nl
X-Trace:	news.tudelft.nl 927968214 19258 130.161.60.189 (29 May 1999 08:56:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT news DOT tudelft DOT nl
NNTP-Posting-Date:	29 May 1999 08:56:54 GMT
X-Newsreader:	Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 16 May 1999 08:39:39 -0400, Sean <sproctor AT enter DOT net> wrote:

>int t = (int)uclock();
>while(t < 0x2000)
>{
>  printf("%i", t);
>  t = (int)uclock();
>}
  Well there you go then, I had the same problem with Uclock. Uclock
is a 64 bit counter and an int is only 32 bit, with me the error was
that about 20 minutes after the first call to uclock it would wrap
around to minus a lot....

ShadSek

- Raw text -