From:	Eugene Ageenko <ageson AT cs DOT joensuu DOT fi>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Portability and size_t type related question
Date:	Thu, 13 May 1999 13:15:13 +0300
Organization:	University of Joensuu / Dept. of Computer Sci.
Lines:	25
Message-ID:	<373AA630.485A105A@cs.joensuu.fi>
References:	<Pine DOT SOL DOT 4 DOT 10 DOT 9905130944050 DOT 5527-100000 AT cs DOT joensuu DOT fi>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	cspc52.joensuu.fi
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language:	ru
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Pasi Franti wrote:
> 
> > Ok. thanx. it is like here then:
> >
> > typedef  unsigned short    U16;
> > typedef  unsigned long     U32;
> > typedef  unsigned char     BYTE;
> 
> I disagree.
> 
> I did not follow your discussion but how did you come up to such
>

exactly.

I have said that I have defined new types in our software (like it is
done in some modules already. see coder source code for example)

the definitions now in a one place and it is easy to find them and
change in a different system.
No wonder I come to problem, if was pushed to use standard types. ;)

Eugene

- Raw text -