From:	Endlisnis <s257m AT unb DOT ca>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: About DJGPP future
Date:	Tue, 27 Apr 1999 22:44:54 -0300
Organization:	BrunNet
Lines:	22
Message-ID:	<37266816.D7C9C5B8@unb.ca>
References:	<371A6934 DOT 9316A109 AT teleline DOT es> <0D7FA3B8EDF023C3 DOT AE99180C1E168410 DOT C9F2E526437F51D3 AT library-proxy DOT airnews DOT net> <199904211139 DOT HAA20858 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <7g38ou$h9g$1 AT arachne DOT labyrinth DOT net DOT au> <3725F1AD DOT EF6F3B8B AT unb DOT ca> <37265531 DOT 2D4ED1FA AT a DOT crl DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	ftnts1c45.brunnet.net
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; U)
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Weiqi Gao wrote:

> Endlisnis wrote:
> >     On many machines these days, DirectX programs run faster than their DOS
> > equivalents.  Most DOS programs only use VESA compatability which isn't
> > enourmously fast (even v2).  On many video cards, they supply directx drivers
> > that can do blits/fills/polygons faster than you can ever hope to do in DOS
> > (unless they tell you how to take advantage of the hardware acceleration).
> Isn't this another one of those "secret hardware" problem (Along the
> lines of WinModem, WinPrinter, and WinBoard)?

    Yes, and that is why I can't play any DOS games that use modems because I fell
victim to the WinModem conspiracy.

--
     (\/) Endlisnis (\/)
          s257m AT unb DOT ca
          Endlisnis AT BrunNet DOT Net
          Endlisnis AT HotMail DOT com
          ICQ: 32959047

- Raw text -