Message-ID:	<00d901ba0b64$b2c378e0$dcf8c6c3@johans-dator>
From:	"Johan Henriksson" <johan DOT he AT telia DOT com>
To:	<djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: mem?
Date:	Sat, 15 Apr 1995 21:11:09 +0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

from Johan Henriksson, Sweden    HTTP://come.to/jhewok  |
Primary mail: johan DOT he AT telia DOT com                  #UIN 12035895
Second: jhe75 AT hotmail DOT com    Third: johan_he AT yahoo DOT com
Leadprogrammer and FX-specialist at Real software
http://come.to/real_software
*************************************************************************
-----Original Message-----
From: Nate Eldredge <nate AT cartsys DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Date: Thursday, April 15, 1999 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: mem?


>Johan Henriksson wrote:
>
>> No, I can't take this any more... (Have had this question on my mind the
>> last month). What will the 'not enough memory' screen look like and how
can
>> I alter it?
>
>Huh?  There is no "'not enough memory' screen".  Running out of memory
>is manifested by `malloc' returning NULL, at which point you can handle
>it however you want.
>
>`xmalloc' will print "Fatal: malloc returned NULL" and exit when memory
>is exhausted.

No, that's not what I mean. I mean, aren't there any errormessages when all
static variables or even the program itself doesn't fit into memory?

>--
>
>Nate Eldredge
>nate AT cartsys DOT com
>

- Raw text -