delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Thu, 15 Apr 1999 13:49:36 +0300 (IDT) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | Chris Jones <chris DOT jones AT ucl DOT ac DOT uk> |
cc: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: SIGSEGV problem with DJGPP (deleting array) |
In-Reply-To: | <7f0g7a$qg7$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.990415134641.26213d-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Tue, 13 Apr 1999, Chris Jones wrote: > The ESP is less than the EBP, which the FAQ suggests means the stack frame > has been overrun. ESP is *normally* less than EBP (since x86 CPUs use a push-down stack). Only if the reverse is correct, or if both ESP and EBP are *very* low, you can suspect a stack-related catastrophe. It seems like you've misread the FAQ. Could you please look back there and tell me what has led you to this interpretation? It is possible that I should change the wording to make it more clear.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |