Mail Archives: djgpp/1999/04/10/10:59:21
From: | "Christopher Nelson" <paradox AT gye DOT satnet DOT net>
|
To: | <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
|
Subject: | Re: Generate c code from c++?
|
Date: | Sat, 10 Apr 1999 08:40:42 -0600
|
Message-ID: | <01be8360$1c6c20e0$LocalHost@thendren>
|
MIME-Version: | 1.0
|
X-Priority: | 3
|
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal
|
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3
|
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3
|
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
>Christopher Nelson wrote:
>>
>> 1st, why would you want to? (C++ is nearly as fast, more flexible, and
>> usually better for the projects that it's written for than equivalent C
>> code.)
>>
>
>I donot want to optimize c++ handly, I just wander how
>c++ deal with the oop issues such as polymophism, multiinherence,
>exceptions, etc.
>I heard that c++ is implemented as a c front before.
this is true. i was corrected on this earlier, and when I started using my
brain, I remembered that. C++ is implemented using a runtime support
package (just like C) only, the RSP for C++ is very extensive, and this code
is what allows the a lot of the stuff that C++ does, although a lot if it is
also handled by the compiler (especially templates) and using pointers and
vtables.
-={C}=-
- Raw text -