From:	Fang <fang0654 AT mypad DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: DJGPP: the future is... FreeDos? DJ-DOS? Linux?
Date:	Fri, 09 Apr 1999 19:33:06 -0400
Organization:	MindSpring Enterprises
Lines:	23
Message-ID:	<370E8E32.9FF2CCFF@mypad.com>
References:	<3 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 16 DOT 19990408222215 DOT 24978170 AT shadow DOT net> <7ejuap$q73$1 AT news DOT ececs DOT uc DOT edu> <7el3lq$j9k$1 AT nnrp1 DOT dejanews DOT com> <7elpkf$5sp$1 AT news DOT ececs DOT uc DOT edu> <199904092134 DOT RAA06265 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	04.10.7c.b9
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Server-Date:	9 Apr 1999 23:31:29 GMT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

DJ Delorie wrote:

> > but the attraction in this idea is...could we do it...
>
> The better question to ask, though, is *should* we do it?  Or should
> we do something else?

I personally miss dos when it was in it's prime.. if an OS was to be
written, it should be compatible with FAT 32, etc, and be reasonably
small... this way people can run it dual-boot, therefore saving the ms
aspect for their families, etc, while also being able to use the OS..
Trying to compete with windows and linux would be pretty much next to
impossible, so if you can't beat em, work with them :)  I'm pretty new
to programming with C, but as i've seen with djgpp, the people who coded
it (I'm pretty sure it was a group effort) did a very good job, and I'm
sure a pretty superior OS can come from the combined skills of all who
are willing to code :)  (sorry for babbling)

Fang

- Raw text -