From:	ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se (Martin Str|mberg)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: INT in INT handler
Date:	6 Apr 1999 05:43:08 GMT
Organization:	University of Lulea, Sweden
Message-ID:	<7ec6tc$a1l$1@news.luth.se>
References:	<7e7ibo$cr4$3 AT news DOT luth DOT se> <37082B22 DOT B96BA80D AT cartsys DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	queeg.ludd.luth.se
X-Newsreader:	TIN [UNIX 1.3 950824BETA PL0]
Lines:	15
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Nate Eldredge (nate AT cartsys DOT com) wrote:
: The INT instruction works even with interrupts disabled.

How can that be? How can I issue an INT when interrupts are disabled?

: Whether the other INT 0x31 handler is okay with having interrupts
: disabled on entry is another question, though.  But I suspect it's
: probably okay.

Aren't interrupts disabled on entry of an interrupt handler?


Arnold, Symphony No. 3,

							MartinS

- Raw text -