Mail Archives: djgpp/1999/03/06/17:01:01
Stuart Moore wrote:
> I can't say Z-Machine graphics are especially demanding, can you?
Precisely. There's no good reason to put assembly routines in a Z
machine interpreter largely written in C.
> Blame Mark Howell and Stefan Jokisch, not me. Believe me, it's
> bizzare.
> Stupid, in fact.
Oh, I was never blaming you.
> By the way - I've remembered the ASM is for byte-swapping now. Any
> help?
Well, there's no reason you can't do "byte-swapping" in C. In
particular, if it's being used for compensating for little- and
big-endian architectures, then that's a pretty lame reason to use
assembly.
--
Erik Max Francis / email max AT alcyone DOT com / whois mf303 / icq 16063900
Alcyone Systems / irc maxxon (efnet) / finger max AT members DOT alcyone DOT com
San Jose, CA / languages En, Eo / web http://www.alcyone.com/max/
USA / icbm 37 20 07 N 121 53 38 W / &tSftDotIotE
\
/ That which is resisted persists.
/ Camden Benares
- Raw text -