Mail Archives: djgpp/1999/03/05/22:41:01
Stuart Moore wrote:
> Excellent question. Interpreting the Z-Machine's not >that< demanding
> on
> PC power, is it?
One need only resort to assembly in _extreme_ cases, say, where 90% of
the CPU power is being expended in a tiny section of very essential
code, say for a graphics engine -- but even then it's often not
_required_, it will just speed things up.
I am puzzled to understand why someone would use assembly in a Z machine
interpreter, unless they simply already had a chunk of assembly code to
do something that they didn't know how to do in C. Even then it seems
like a bizarre reason to put the dependency on assembly in there.
--
Erik Max Francis / email max AT alcyone DOT com / whois mf303 / icq 16063900
Alcyone Systems / irc maxxon (efnet) / finger max AT members DOT alcyone DOT com
San Jose, CA / languages En, Eo / web http://www.alcyone.com/max/
USA / icbm 37 20 07 N 121 53 38 W / &tSftDotIotE
\
/ No man is more cheated than the selfish man.
/ Henry Ward Beecher
- Raw text -