From:	"Elias Pschernig" <f DOT x DOT gruber-museum-arnsdorf AT magnet DOT at>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Allegro : MMX or not MMX ???
Date:	Tue, 23 Feb 1999 18:14:46 +0100
Organization:	magnet Gesellschaft für digitale Kommunikation m.b.H
Lines:	20
Message-ID:	<7aunpe$p0q$1@orudios.magnet.at>
References:	<36D01C7B DOT B72C38E3 AT club-internet DOT fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	195.3.67.112
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

>Hello everybody,
>    When I run allegro\tests\test.exe , the 'Profile 3D' option finds
>out that the 3D routines display the same number of polygons per second
>whether the 'MMX option' is enabled or not. In some cases (RGB Gouraud
>Shading with 8bpp depth colors), it finds out that the MMX routines are
>slower than the 'no MMX' ones. Is it normal ?
>
>    I have a PentiumII 300MHz and when I make the Allegro library, it
>confirms that my assembler supports MMX instructions ! I have enabled
>the Pentium optimisations by setting PGCC to 1 in the makefile. Is there
>anything else to do ?
>


When i enable MMX, some polygon functions are A BIT faster.
(on Pentium 200 Mhz)

- Raw text -