Mail Archives: djgpp/1999/02/17/00:07:04
From: | "Kelly Harrelson" <ksharrel AT mindspring DOT com>
|
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.programmer,comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc
|
Subject: | Re: 16-bit Apps under Windows NT
|
Date: | Tue, 16 Feb 1999 23:35:26 -0500
|
Organization: | MindSpring Enterprises
|
Lines: | 53
|
Message-ID: | <7adgtb$h94$1@samsara0.mindspring.com>
|
References: | <7acb6p$9fk$1 AT news0-alterdial DOT uu DOT net> <7acv11$ef0$1 AT remarQ DOT com>
|
NNTP-Posting-Host: | d1.56.62.b5
|
X-Server-Date: | 17 Feb 1999 04:34:51 GMT
|
X-Newsreader: | Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
|
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
|
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
|
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com
|
The compiler was Metaware's High-C v1.6. I don't believe it was
loading a DOS extender.
J. Marshall wrote in message <7acv11$ef0$1 AT remarQ DOT com>...
>You don't specify *which* compiler it is, so I can only offer a guess:
>some, many, of the old 16 bit compilers load a DOS extender as part or
their
>operation. That will present you with a problem on an NT machine.
>Buy a newer compiler, or get a machine for dedicated use for your 16bit
>development. If networked, it could share files, and something like a
>200MHz Pentium running DOS 6.22 would only cost about $600, maybe less,
>these days.
>
>
>
>Kelly Harrelson wrote in message <7acb6p$9fk$1 AT news0-alterdial DOT uu DOT net>...
>>I have an *old* 16-bit cross compiler that runs under DOS and generates
>>.OBJs for a proprietary platform. The compiler worked fine under DOS,
>>Windows 3.11, and Windows 95. When we moved to Windows NT, we ran into
>>problems. Running it under the default shell, cmd.exe
>>(\winnt\system32\cmd.exe), would cause the entire shell to exit,
instantly,
>>with no error messages or anything. One of our developers noticed however
>>that it ran fine under the command.com shell
(\winnt\system32\command.com).
>>So, we happily continued using it under the alternate shell. Now, with
>>Windows NT Service Pack 4 installed (as well as Developer Studio 97
Service
>>Pack 3, although I don't know if that could effect it), it has stopped
>>working, but not in the same way as before. When calling the compiler
from
>>a batch file, the batch file just exits and the shell stays intact.
>Calling
>>the compiler from NMAKE just causes NMAKE to hang.
>>
>>Has anyone else noticed any problems with older 16-bit apps? Anyone have
>>any ideas? Does anyone know why it worked for a while under command.com
but
>>not cmd.exe?
>>
>>If there is another group I should post this to, please let me know. This
>>problem is quite frustrating and I would really like to get it solved.
Any
>>help would be appreciated.
>>
>>Thanks in advance.
>>-Shane
>>
>>
>
>
- Raw text -