delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Tue, 16 Feb 1999 22:03:16 -0500 |
Message-Id: | <199902170303.WAA10778@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <Pine.SV4.3.93.990217083639.18320A-100000@tagore> |
(rajukv AT wipinfo DOT soft DOT net) | |
Subject: | Re: constructor names |
References: | <Pine DOT SV4 DOT 3 DOT 93 DOT 990217083639 DOT 18320A-100000 AT tagore> |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
> In C++, can I call the constructor for a class by any other name? No. Why would you want to? You almost never refer to it by name anyway, but only by inference when you instantiate an object of that class: foo x; foo *x = new foo(); Since you can overload the constructor, you don't need different names just to pass different arguments either.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |