delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Fri, 12 Feb 1999 16:56:21 -0500 |
Message-Id: | <199902122156.QAA21804@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <3.0.6.32.19990212164718.0081b960@pop.netaddress.com> (message |
from Paul Derbyshire on Fri, 12 Feb 1999 16:47:18 -0500) | |
Subject: | Re: Re-entrancy questions. |
References: | <3 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 32 DOT 19990212164718 DOT 0081b960 AT pop DOT netaddress DOT com> |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
> Is the DJGPP 'new' thread-safe already, or should someone developing > a threading library for DJGPP wrap 'new' to be thread-safe? I don't think anyone has put any efforts into making djgpp's libraries re-entrant or thread safe, so I suppose the answer is no unless someone does the research to prove otherwise or make it so.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |