Date:	Tue, 26 Jan 1999 15:04:47 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	HANRIGOU Philippe <HANRIGOU AT cgste DOT mq>
cc:	"'starone AT calvanet DOT calvacom DOT fr'" <starone AT calvanet DOT calvacom DOT fr>,
	"'djgpp AT delorie DOT com'" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: your mail
In-Reply-To:	<75D022D8BFAED2119B08009027303F582E0E@mail>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990126150107.8764B-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 26 Jan 1999, HANRIGOU Philippe wrote:

> I don't know  if the server part can be easily ported to DOS as it
> make intensive use of fork/exec paradigm.

What programs does it fork?

Also, does your port work on plain DOS, or on Windows/Winsock only?

If the latter, you could use something like ``system("start /min foo")''
as a replacement for fork/exec.

If the former, what do you use as TCP/IP layer for the ported package?

- Raw text -