Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/12/26/23:05:46
In article <36859B17 DOT CD70960C AT montana DOT com>, bowman <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>Ah, precisely. Thank you. I haven't used minG too much and assumed the
>binary was stripped automagically like the rsxntdj. If nothing else,
>minG doesn't come with anything remotely resembling the djgppFAQ. Guess
>that's part of the 'minimal'.
Partly that, but mostly due the fact that nobody has written one yet.
Hopefully we'll have one someday in the not-so-distant future.
DJGPP has certain big advantages (maturity, extensive documentation,
large user base, and so on) that definitely helps anything based on it
or associated with (such as rsxntdj).
>I live in a past cluttered with 180K 5 1/4 in floppies. Just showing my
>age.
Been there.
Regards,
Mumit
- Raw text -