Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/12/02/03:46:53
On Tue, 1 Dec 1998, Rich Dawe wrote:
> However, using these three steps results in a protection fault.
> The solution is not to use step 3, since the code then works fine - the
> function gets called, etc. This appears to work, because
> _go32_dpmi_chain_<blah>() calls the _go32_dpmi_set_<blah>() function for
> you (as can be seen by looking at the library source, lsr201.zip).
You are right, the FAQ is incorrect. It seems the behavior was
changed in DJGPP v2, and I never noticed. Thanks for pointing this
out, I will correct it in the next release.
Sorry for not catching this myself.
- Raw text -