delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | "Jason Glass" <empirepaper AT cwix DOT com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | construction has been delayed due to somebody's stupidity (most likely my own) |
Lines: | 29 |
X-Newsreader: | Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 |
Message-ID: | <5zeY1.843$SI2.270@news.cwix.com> |
Date: | Sat, 24 Oct 1998 00:47:19 -0600 |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | 166.55.6.83 |
X-Trace: | news.cwix.com 909210945 166.55.6.83 (Sat, 24 Oct 1998 06:35:45 GMT) |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | Sat, 24 Oct 1998 06:35:45 GMT |
Organization: | CWIX |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
hey... my simple question is, when i do the following (as an example): class MyClass { public: MyClass(); protected: int data; }; void main() { MyClass instance(); // point of interest } on the line in question, it tries to accept 'instance()' as a classname, and it totally misses the concept that it might be trying to construct the class. the only way i can get this to work is by declaring a class pointer object and initializing it, then destroying it at the end manually. i have not had this problem in other dos compilers, though i HAVE had this sample problem with linux gcc (ooh.. big surprise.. :) anyways, could somebody please tell me what's going on.. thanks a bunch. jason glass
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |