delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | Sigurdur Smarason <ssmaraso AT emerald DOT tufts DOT edu> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: newbie:problem with fread |
Date: | 3 Oct 1998 15:55:08 GMT |
Organization: | Tufts University |
Lines: | 11 |
Message-ID: | <6v5hcs$s0q$1@news3.tufts.edu> |
References: | <6v4386$c7t$1 AT news3 DOT tufts DOT edu> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | emerald.tufts.edu |
X-Trace: | news3.tufts.edu 907430108 28698 (None) 130.64.1.16 |
X-Complaints-To: | news AT news DOT tufts DOT edu |
X-Newsreader: | TIN [UNIX 1.3 unoff BETA 970705; alpha OSF1 V4.0] |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Now if I call each seperately as in: size=fread(&header.norm_offset,sizeof(header.norm_offset),1,data); size=fread(&header.extra_records,sizeof(header.extra_records),1,data); size=fread(&header.num_records,sizeof(header.num_records),1,data); etc. it works as it should, but this is rather clumsy in my opinion, is there a better way ?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |