Message-Id:	<199810021715.TAA60114@ieva06.lanet.lv>
From:	"Andris Pavenis" <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com, Philosopher DOT bbs AT titan DOT cc DOT ntu DOT edu DOT tw (ªü­õ)
Date:	Fri, 2 Oct 1998 19:20:17 +0300
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: default functions in g++ ?
In-reply-to:	<3QhCAB$Par@titan.cc.ntu.edu.tw>
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01b)
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from Quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id MAA08368

From:           	Philosopher DOT bbs AT titan DOT cc DOT ntu DOT edu DOT tw (ªü­õ)
Subject:        	default functions in g++ ?
Date sent:      	01 Oct 1998 03:58:34 GMT
Organization:   	CSZone BBS
To:             	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> 
>         I have a few c++ programs.
> 
>         I compile them without linking with libg++.
> 
>         At the linkage phase, the following errors were reported:
> 
>                 undefined reference to ___bultin_vec_new
>                 undefined reference to ___delete
>                 undefined reference to ___eh_pc
>                 undefined reference to ___throw
>                 undefined reference to _terminate
> 
>         Where can I find documents describing these functions?
> 
>         Is there any source code about these functions?
> 
> --
> ¡° Origin: µ{¦¡³]­p¼Ö¶é ¡» From: titan.ee.ntu.edu.tw
> 

You are mixing versions of gcc and libstdc++ and libg++. My 
experience shows that it is Ok for C but not for C++ (!!!!)

e.g. using libstdc++-2.8.1.1 or libg++-2.8.1.1 with gcc-2.7.2.1.
The same problem will be when port of egcs-1.1 will be released
(perhaps when DJGPP-2.02 will be released).

So ALL C++ sources MUST be compiled with the same version of 
gcc (even mixing gcc-2.8.0 and gcc-2.8.1 is not Ok as shows my 
experience)

Andris

- Raw text -