Mail Archives: djgpp/1998/08/28/09:10:26
Carsten Svaneborg <zqex AT usa DOT com> wrote:
> Thanx for the replies!
>
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Aug 1998, Carsten Svaneborg wrote:
> > > Anybody have a clue?
> > Check your memory chips and the BIOS setup. GCC is memory-intensive
> > program that moves large buffers to and fro.
>
> Hmm. I run it under NT and I would be surprised if NT didn't
> use much more memory than gcc.
Is not a question of amount of memory used is a question of *how* the memory
is used!
> And NT can report ram problems,
I really doubt it, perhaps NT can detect kernel corruptions, but it doesn't
mean it can detect RAM problems.
> but runing netscape and other programs haven't been a problem,
> but my computer have probably been running for about one or
> two weeks now, doing simulations but the ventilator air isn't
> even hot. Maybe I should turn it off for the weekend, and see
> what happens.
Here is my experience with RAM problems:
1) There is no way to detect the problem in a consistent way. I tried to make
a program that allocates ALL the memory and then uses it in various way
(linear access, random access, butterfly) making various things (shifts, bit
patterns, etc). The test needs about 40 minutes for 32 Mb in my system.
Result: NO even a bit failed.
2) Windows 95 works ok with these RAMs. No more hangs than the expected ;-).
3) The only programs that really show the problems are: gcc compiling an
intensive thing or tar/gzip uncompressing a huge file both under DOS and
Linux.
The rest normally works OK.
SET
------------------------------------ 0 --------------------------------
Visit my home page: http://set-soft.home.ml.org/
or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org
ICQ: 2951574
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA
TE: +(541) 759 0013
- Raw text -